NYC Pays $100 Million for Empty Preschools as 3-K Expansion Stalls Citywide

Costly mistakes in universal preschool expansion highlight the pitfalls of hasty policymaking and carry lessons for public spending across urban America.

At nearly $100 million, New York City’s most expensive preschools do not boast elite teachers or avant-garde pedagogy. They are, in a word, empty. The city, long lauded for its ambition in early childhood education, has been paying rent and utilities on 28 buildings that, five years after they were acquired, hum with little more than silence.

This expensive oversight traces to former Mayor Bill de Blasio’s vaunted “3-K For All” initiative, a flagship policy meant to place free, full-day preschool within reach of every three-year-old. The plan, hatched in haste and completed with little scrutiny of local need, saw 47 new sites earmarked and upwards of $400 million allocated for construction and refurbishment. Half a decade later, most of these properties remain devoid of children — and potential.

Of the 28 buildings now sapping funds from the city’s budget, some have been grudgingly repurposed as temporary homes for charter schools, a Department of Education intake center, or other odds and ends. But the majority sit idle, their shiny interiors never having hosted a single naptime, circle, or snack.

The bureaucratic inertia that keeps these projects afloat is dispiritingly familiar. The city’s Department of Education continues to pony up rents — in the case of one Queens site, roughly $500,000 annually — regardless of actual usage. The meter ticks onward, to the tune of $99.3 million and counting, even as public finances buckle under the weight of post-pandemic cost pressures.

The original sin, as several former DOE officials now attest, was not corruption but “terrible execution.” In the heat to burnish a mayoral legacy, sites were chosen with sparse regard for the demographics or preferences of local families. In one notable misfire, an expensive facility was opened in an Orthodox Jewish neighborhood with little appetite for secular programs. The city’s urgent drive to provide seats far outpaced careful study of whether those seats would ever be filled.

Such “phantom” infrastructure is more than a rounding error: it saps resources that could address glaring needs elsewhere. While some neighbourhoods scramble to secure affordable preschool options, others host gleaming but useless “initiative projects.” Meanwhile, the city’s annual education budget, already $37 billion, creaks under the added burden.

Beyond fiscal waste, poor planning inflicts subtler harms. Faith that local government can effectively marshal resources is whittled away by each ghostly classroom and locked play-yard. When politics prizes pronouncements over prudence, public scepticism is the natural, if regrettable, dividend.

The debacle reverberates beyond New York. Urban policymakers across America, quick to emulate New York’s educational fervor, should note that even noble intentions may invite farce if implementation lags aspiration. Comparable rollout stumbles have been evident — if less costly — in cities like Chicago and Los Angeles, often with similar tales of unused facilities and fleeting bureaucratic memory.

An object lesson in policy gone awry

The political finger-pointing has followed the script. Mr de Blasio, in characteristically defensive tones, blames his successor for a lack of “parent-friendly outreach.” Mayor Eric Adams, never one to let a predecessor off lightly, laments having “inherited a system with thousands of empty early childhood seats.” Whether a future administration will reap the presumed surge in demand remains an open — and dubious — question.

Globally, the cautionary tale carries resonance. While Scandinavian countries have built successful universal early education systems, their efforts have tended to move not at breakneck speed, but with slow, data-driven engagement and constant adjustment. American cities, by contrast, frequently elevate the grand announcement above the slow grind of local administration or the patient work of building civic trust.

What is to be done? A prosaic but effective beginning: rigorous demand mapping before acquisition, transparent audit trails for ongoing expenditures, and a willingness to revisit and repurpose sites more creatively. City governments might not be able to eliminate all missteps, but data-informed humility would help avoid the more expensive ones.

The lure of big-ticket announcements is not likely to recede. New York, with its taste for grand gestures, will inevitably try again. But as this costly experiment in universal preschool has shown, the distance between ambition and impact can be, financially and functionally, gargantuan. For now, the city’s aspiring three-year-olds — and their parents — must watch the saga unfold from afar, hoping the next round of public investment absorbs the lessons of this puny return.

■