E-Scooter Surge Doubles in East Bronx and Queens, With Ridership Racing Ahead of Consensus

As e-scooters zoom into the outer boroughs, New Yorkers and their stewards confront both a mobility leap and a tangle of civic headaches.

On a humid Tuesday in June, a line of sweat-speckled commuters queued beside a modest flotilla of neon-green e-scooters outside Citi Field in Flushing, Queens. Not so long ago, this tableau—postal workers in uniform and teens in baseball caps priming their phone apps—would have seemed fanciful. Yet by mid-2025, e-scooters had become as common as dollar-slice pizza in the city’s least subway-served precincts.

Since New York City’s Department of Transportation (DOT) launched its Shared E-Scooter Program in the East Bronx in 2021, the scheme has quietly ballooned. The arrival of dockless scooters from three competing firms—Lime, Bird, and Veo—into Eastern Queens this year pushed annual ridership citywide past the two-million mark. With Lime responsible for more than 1.1 million trips between January and June alone—double its 2024 figure—the city’s appetite for this form of micromobility appears insatiable.

The moment is, however, both buoyant and fraught. Fans, such as Anthony Rodriguez, a Bronx native and ferry commuter, hail e-scooters as a rare improvement in mobility options for working-class New Yorkers. “Growing up in Soundview, the public transportation was horrible. We needed more options,” he recounts; his daily Lime ride, an indispensable last-mile connector, shapes not just his morning but his career choices.

Each of the firms trumpets a vision for a greener, more accessible metropolis. According to Nicole Yearwood of Lime, e-scooters are busiest during the classic rush hours, shepherding their users between, and sometimes beyond, patchy bus and rail lines. DOT calculates that two million e-scooter trips equate to over 500,000 avoided car journeys and a paltry 24,000 gallons of gasoline not burned—incremental, but not insignificant, wins in the city’s halting march toward sustainability.

City officials have been keen to frame the scheme as a tool in their lucha against congestion and climate change. A shared, low-emission alternative—at least in theory—relieves pressure from over-taxed roads and sidewalks, while also burnishing New York’s eco-credentials. Supporters argue that e-scooter schemes accomplish what decades of utopian transit planning failed to do: bring nimble, affordable transit to transit deserts in the outer boroughs.

But this vision is not universally held. For all the boosters’ claims, many locals remain unimpressed. Testy letters to the editor catalogue the civic costs: scooters abandoned willy-nilly on pavements, daredevil riders flouting red lights, and a steady trickle of mishaps. At community board meetings, exasperated residents count injuries, decry “sidewalk slalom” and demand regulation or outright bans. Those who live and govern in the pilot areas find themselves refereeing fractious arguments about safety, urban order, and civic space.

So far, the city’s regulatory response has been typically New York—halfway between laissez-faire and draconian. Companies have been prodded to sponsor designated parking “corrals” (sometimes stylishly painted by local artists, to sweeten the pill), and the NYPD occasionally doles out tickets to reckless speedsters. Whether these half-measures suffice remains open to question. The city’s Vision Zero campaign, ambitious on paper, has struggled to keep micromobility fatalities and injuries flat. Serious incidents involving e-scooters, while far from the carnage wrought by cars, nonetheless rattle confidence in the programme’s safety bona fides.

A cautionary swerve in the micromobility lane

The knock-on effects radiate outward, from street level to economic and political spheres. For small businesses, better local mobility might bode well; corner stores and restaurants in the Bronx and Queens could see a modest uptick in custom as errands become less arduous. Yet insurance claims, municipal liability, and contentious cost-sharing for curb management have all begun to rear their heads. Meanwhile, municipal flirtation with permanent adoption remains just that—a flirtation. Lawmakers fret about managing e-scooter clutter as well as addressing equity; will this mode serve the neighborhoods that need it most, or merely aggravate inequalities in street safety and infrastructure?

New York’s e-scooter experiment now stands as part of a global pattern. Paris, after much fanfare, recently banned rental e-scooters outright following a public referendum and a glut of accidents. London, by contrast, has opted for tightly controlled pilots with limited providers and heavy enforcement, while American peers like Los Angeles have swung between expansion and retreat. Against this backdrop, New York’s modus operandi—expansion tethered to cautious, sometimes grudging oversight—looks neither uniquely prudent nor especially foolhardy.

For now, the data tell a story more nuanced than either evangelists or alarmists admit. A notable share of e-scooter trips are replacements for short car journeys rather than walks. The carbon savings, while real, are dwarfed by the city’s daunting transportation emissions. And while a patchwork of designated scooter parking areas has curbed the worst sidewalk blockages, logistical irritants perpetuate: battery swaps, unscrupulous parking, and exposure to inclement weather.

Still, the city could do worse than to keep nudging its e-scooter regime. Compared with the lumbering public bus system and sclerotic expansion of subway lines, the micromobility rollout is a rare instance of urban progress proceeding at something close to the speed of change itself. Were city officials to invest in sturdier infrastructure, from protected lanes to parking, more of the benefits—and fewer of the drawbacks—could plausibly accrue.

A reliably dry lesson emerges: while no one mode will solve either New York’s climate woes or its mobility paradox, pilots like the Shared E-Scooter Program merit measured optimism. Policymakers fond of euphoria should recall that even the future of transit still needs a practical curb to park on.

■